Nowadays competition between software producers is severe. So, one has every reason to believe that quality of a software product is of the first priority during any software development process, mobile application testing, desktop testing and web site testing.
Quality assurance team is supposed not only to indicate the existing errors, but also to determine whether the elaborated system is ready for production. For this reason testers should have some authority and ability to influence processes and important decisions on the project.
Testers Should Have Power To:
- to suspend the development process till serious errors have been fixed;
- to postpone the application release if, in the opinion of the test manager, the system quality is low and some defects must be corrected before the software goes into production.
It’s self-evident that such decisions must be grounded by solid arguments.
But project managers are guided not only by desire to create high-quality application. They must take into account business aspects as well.
Unfortunately, ambitions to deliver the software product earlier than the competitors and to spend as little money, as possible make management save time and resources in prejudice of quality. It is not surprising that such an approach leads to releasing low-quality programs with numerous defects.
A software testing company can prevent a low-quality application from going into production, if it has enough authority on the project.
Upper managers frequently underestimate the role of testers. They prefer to sacrifice quality in order to meet the deadlines they promised the business owners. In such cases the developers and testers are required to execute tasks for given time, regardless of the quality.
Besides, if testers have no real power to influence the development process, programmers pay little attention to their remarks and do not hurry to fix the reported defects. They correct only those errors that the managers tell them to correct.
There may be a situation that the developers and testers are aware that the system has serious errors, but they cannot correct them as they have other instructions from the upper managers.
As a final result, the system can be released as planned, but it will contain many imperfections and the end-users most probably won’t be satisfied with it. If end-users don’t want to use the software, it means that the project is failed.
Such things never happen, if web site testing, desktop testing and mobile testing is executed properly, and the test team has the authority to influence the development process. In this case the system may be released later than the upper managers anticipate, but will be high-quality, and the users will like it.
This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.
